Відео

We need 85 and 50mm like rhis one!

I would take 35mm 1.4, 50mm 1.8 S, 100mm 2.8 Macro and 24-120 f/4 S 😊 You get character, sharpness and reach 👌 35mm 1.4 is a lens Im gonna buy without hesitation because I love 35mm focal lenght

Why here is no SE model for the look of Zf? It should be easy to do so.

Is that 35 1.4 a Tamron lens?

28mm 1.4 with similar size and build would be super useful for documentary style weddings and events. It would probably be glued to one of my camera bodies for most of my work. Come on Nikon, you can do it!!

Recently the Photonstophotos website published DR chart comparing z6 ii vs z6 iii. The chart shows that z6iii noticeable worser than z6 ii in terms of DR. What do you thinking about it?

为什么这个视频不能自动翻译生成中文字幕？是上传的格式问题吗？为什么其他外国博主的视频能翻译中文字幕

i need a 20mm but smaller than the actual 20 f1.8S. i hope to see one soon

I use the 24 a lot for video, and much of the time i record using the dx crop mode to get a 35mm fov. Also use the 50mm lens... So, probably a 35 1.4 which crops to almost 50mm might be a dream, specially a lens with this much personality that i miss on the 24 and the 50...

First time seeing your channel, probably because im interested in this lens, its looking good so far. I really hope it lives up to what im expecting, if it does I think Nikon will have a real winner on their hands, then they need to do a 50 and an 85 as well.

Nice to hear I'm not the only one who really does not like 35mm focal length, preferring 28mm instead. Personally I also do not like 50mm. Just like 35mm it's too plain, giving me nothing interesting. Above that, I start liking things from about 70mm, with top-tier portrait length at 135mm.

I want a 85 or a 105mm of this same lens line

Very interesting.. I mostly shoot on my z8 wide open to 2.8 so it makes me wonder if I should stick with the 1.8s I’ve got.. I mean there is probably no point selling my 1.8 to get a 1.4 I’d be losing money but it’s very interesting.

A wonderful comparison and explanation of the 2 lens choices. The boke shot pretty much explained everything I needed to know about the potential use case. For my purposes I prefer my 24mm and under focal lengths to be sharp as possible but would prefer my 28mm to short tele focal lengths to have some character and not necessarily be ultra sharp at wider apertures. Thanks again to Ricci for making this video.

Can the 35mm 1.4 do linear manual focus for video? I know this is an S-Line feature but very much hope they’ve retained this option for the video shooters

50 1.4 please

Thank you Ricci - I really love your lens reviews - spot on. Thank you! -PD

still waiting 35mm f/1.2

That's fantastic , now make a whole line of it ;24, 35, 50 and 85. Nikon will sell truckloads of those and even make thenz system very attractive .

Everything else waits when a new Ricci vid drops ✋🏻🙂📷

To all with an "f/1.4" OCD: (1) the f/1.4 does not precisely inform you how fast the lens is; (2) the f/1.4 does not inform you how shallow the depth of field will be. (3) most lenses with a presumed "constant aperture" that have focus breathing (being classical lens designs where all elements have a fixed arrangement relative to each other) actually also have aperture breathing. When you focus closer by than infinity, focal length and aperture number increase. If you thinks so this is not true, and graduated from photography school, go ask your money back. If you did not got to that school but think you know better, then you clearly don't know what you are talking about.

That's actually a surprising nice lens, the rendering is very pretty. Now I will just have to wait for the 1.2 S line to compare haha

Interesting view, why didn't they put the S line coatings in this lens, as it's still quite expensive for a non-S ?

@RicciTalks I have been looking at replacing my sigma 35mm 1.4 Art lens that, combined with the FTZ adapter, is really heavy. I really like the image quality it gives me. I don't know if you have ever used this lens in the past, but if so how would you compare it to the new 35 in terms of sharpness, image quality and overall rendering? Thanks for the great, honest and useful job you are doing for the Nikon users.

Sounds perfect to me 👌🏻

I'm also waiting for the Nikkor 28mm f/1.4, maybe even f/1.8

I think this lens could be great for Nikon, even better than the z6iii. Nikonrumors is saying their is a 50mm coming, so I hope a lineup of these would serve Nikon Z very well. Nikon chose to embrace competition, contrary to Canon and this lens will be very competitive against the Chinese brands. Since the advent of the Z mount, prices of lens have gone up quite a bit, this and hopefully at least a 50 and 85, would make many who are not pixel peepers either move from F to Z partially or fully and even get new or people switching.

Excellent review. I've noticed with my Z lenses which are incredibly sharp, but that all the Z lenses I own feel like they produce the "same image" but at different focal lengths. I didn't understand exactly why I felt that way until I bought myself a Nikon F mount 58mm f1.4G lens. Although it is not very sharp, it has a character that I love. So glad that Nikon realized this themselves and gives a different perspective of a lens with character.

Thank you, Ricci, for the great information!

What about distortion and vignetting? I'd like to see a comparison.

I agree 28 1.4 would be needed!

this lens almost seems to good to be true

Thank you for this comparison. I always wanted to get an S-line prime, but could never justify the cost. This 35mm f1.4 will be a perfect "premium" replacement for my little 40mm f2. My 40 f2 has been my favorite little street shooter, and I think this 35 f1.4 will be my new favorite for portraits. Thanks Ricci

Thank you for this comparison. I always wanted to get an S-line prime, but could never justify the cost. This 35mm f1.4 will be a perfect "premium" replacement for my little 40mm f2. My 40 f2 has been my favorite little street shooter, and I think this 35 f1.4 will be my new favorite for portraits. Thanks Ricci

My two questions: is it better & sharper wide open than the Sigma ART 35 1.4 with FTZ adapter - my only remaining F mount lens, next to the Nikon 105/1.4 which will probably remain cemented onto a FTZ forever. And secondly: will there be a difference in AF speed/stickiness in difficult light because of only one AF motor? I use my Sigma 35/1.4 for shots on the dance floor at weddings or events. Lots of movement, both from people & faces and spot lights and LEDs. I'm tempted to try it out, but if it's the same as the Sigma (optical/AF), but just without FTZ, I don't see the point and will just use the Sigma until it dies or gets stolen.

Thank you for your explicit dislike of the 35mm focal length (only seconded by Chris Nichols of PetaPixel)😂. I am with you both: couldn't get on with that AOV.

I hope nikon bring out a Z200 f4 that can take converters for macro, or a replacement Z300 f4 with close focus to replace the old 300 f4 pf.

Needs comparisons at mid and far distance for bokeh. Please get inspiration from Philip Reeve Net bokeh reviews. The puffin shot at 10:00 has nervous bokeh already on the right of the bird and strong foreground bokeh swirl.

Thank you for your detailed explanations. Unfortunately, I have to say that I am still completely pixelated.

I've been waiting for the 35mm f/1.2 for a few years...😢

Thank you for this video! My dream would be a combo of similar style 28mm 1.4 and 40mm 1.4.

Thank you for this video. Would you say that this lens would be a better option than the 35/1.8S for full length and environmental portraits?

What about nightscape?

Interesting, I have the 50mm 1.8, stellar lens. I also have the 40mm f2 which I love too. I hope they do an 85mm 1.4..

👍🏾🙏🏾 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇸🇪🇹🇹

Ricci: You are a wonderful resource to explain Nikon to me.

Thank you for this useful comparison. I like the direction Nikon is taking with the new f/1.4 lens. Additional control ring and smoother bokeh transitions are appreciated as well as the weight, size and price. Also a reason why i still like to use F-Mount lenses like the AF-S 105 mm f/1.4E ED which is a legend. I don't have the AF-S 58 mm f/1.4 but many people like it for the special image rendering it can give.

Great video! Would have liked to see a sharpness comparison at F1.8, F2, F2.2 range. Love that this came out, but it should have been 2 years ago for an 'imperfect' design.

Great...I'm buying this :D

Did you go to Skomer Island? How did you get so close to the puffin?